Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
125 Views
12 Downloads
Share this article
Review Article | Volume:2 Issue: 1 (Jan-Dec, 2025) | Pages 27 - 31
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: New Therapeutic Modalities and Surgical Innovations
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
2
Independent Research Scholar, Iarcon international LLP, Guwahati, Assam India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 3, 2025
Revised
Feb. 9, 2025
Accepted
March 16, 2025
Published
June 28, 2025
Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition affecting aging men, characterized by non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland and commonly leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As the global population ages, the incidence of BPH is increasing, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Traditionally managed through lifestyle changes, pharmacological treatments, and surgical intervention for advanced cases, the landscape of BPH management has evolved with recent innovations. These include advancements in medical therapies, such as combination treatment with alpha-blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, and minimally invasive surgical techniques like laser-based therapies, prostatic urethral lift (UroLift), and water vapor therapy (Rezum). Moreover, emerging technologies such as aquablation and prostate artery embolization are reshaping the treatment paradigm, offering improved efficacy and reduced side effects. This review explores the latest developments in the medical and surgical management of BPH, focusing on personalized treatment approaches and emerging technologies that optimize patient outcomes.

Keywords
Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common urological conditions affecting aging men. Characterized by the non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland, BPH can lead to bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as urinary frequency, urgency, nocturia, and incomplete bladder emptying. As men age, the prevalence of BPH increases significantly, affecting approximately 50% of men in their 50s and up to 90% of men in their 80s.1,2

While BPH is not a life-threatening condition, it has a profound impact on quality of life and can lead to complications such as acute urinary retention, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), bladder stones, and even kidney damage. The traditional management of BPH has centered around lifestyle modifications, pharmacological treatments, and surgical intervention for refractory cases. However, recent advancements in medical therapies and surgical techniques have transformed the management of BPH, offering more personalized, effective, and less invasive options.3,4

This article reviews the latest therapeutic modalities and surgical innovations in the treatment of BPH, examining current trends, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies that are reshaping the landscape of BPH management.

Body

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of BPH5-7

1. Prevalence and Risk Factors

BPH is a highly prevalent condition, with studies showing that nearly half of men over the age of 50 experience symptoms related to BPH. The likelihood of developing BPH increases with age, and risk factors include:

  • Age: The most significant risk factor, as BPH is rarely seen in men under 40, but its prevalence rises dramatically in men over 50.
  • Hormonal Changes: Age-related changes in testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels contribute to prostatic hyperplasia. DHT, a more potent form of testosterone, promotes prostate cell proliferation, leading to gland enlargement.
  • Family History: Genetics play a role, with men who have a family history of BPH being at a higher risk of developing the condition.
  • Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have been associated with an increased risk of BPH and more severe LUTS.

2. Pathophysiology of BPH

BPH occurs due to the proliferation of both glandular and stromal components of the prostate, resulting in the enlargement of the periurethral region of the prostate gland. This enlargement obstructs urine flow by compressing the urethra, which leads to increased resistance to urine outflow from the bladder. Over time, the bladder compensates by increasing muscle tone, but this leads to bladder overactivity and detrusor instability.

Additionally, chronic obstruction can result in detrusor muscle hypertrophy and decreased bladder compliance, contributing to long-term bladder dysfunction and LUTS. This progressive obstruction may eventually result in urinary retention, where the bladder is unable to completely empty, requiring urgent intervention.

Current Medical Management of BPH8-10

The management of BPH has traditionally started with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy, with surgery being reserved for patients who fail to respond to medical treatment or develop complications. New advancements in pharmacological agents have expanded the options for medical management, providing more targeted and effective treatments for BPH.

1. Alpha-Blockers

Alpha-blockers have long been the first-line treatment for BPH, working by relaxing the smooth muscle of the prostate and bladder neck to improve urine flow. These agents, such as tamsulosin, alfuzosin, and silodosin, block alpha-1 adrenergic receptors, which are responsible for smooth muscle contraction in the prostate.

Benefits:
  • Rapid improvement in LUTS, typically within days to weeks of initiation.
  • Well-tolerated by most patients, with minimal side effects.
Challenges:
  • Alpha-blockers do not reduce prostate size or halt the progression of BPH.
  • Side effects may include dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, and retrograde ejaculation.

2. 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors (5-ARIs)

5-ARIs, such as finasteride and dutasteride, target the hormonal pathway that drives prostate enlargement by inhibiting the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase, which converts testosterone into DHT. By reducing DHT levels, these drugs shrink the prostate and improve LUTS over time.

Benefits:
  • Effective in reducing prostate size, particularly in men with large prostates (>40 cc).
  • Long-term use reduces the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical intervention.
Challenges:
  • Slower onset of action compared to alpha-blockers, with improvement in symptoms taking 6-12 months.
  • Side effects include sexual dysfunction, decreased libido, and gynecomastia.

3. Combination Therapy

For men with moderate-to-severe symptoms or large prostate volumes, combination therapy using both alpha-blockers and 5-ARIs has been shown to be more effective than either agent alone. Large clinical trials have demonstrated that combination therapy significantly reduces symptom progression, lowers the risk of acute urinary retention, and decreases the likelihood of needing surgery.

4. Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5 Inhibitors)

PDE5 inhibitors, such as tadalafil, originally developed for erectile dysfunction (ED), have shown benefits in treating LUTS associated with BPH. By increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels, PDE5 inhibitors relax smooth muscle in the lower urinary tract and prostate, improving urinary flow.

Benefits:
  • Dual efficacy in treating both BPH and ED, which commonly coexist in older men.
Challenges:
  • PDE5 inhibitors are not suitable for all patients, particularly those taking nitrates for cardiovascular conditions, due to the risk of severe hypotension.

5. Emerging Pharmacotherapies

Advances in the understanding of BPH pathophysiology have led to the development of newer pharmacological agents targeting alternative pathways involved in prostate growth and bladder function. These include beta-3 adrenergic agonists, such as mirabegron, which target detrusor overactivity in patients with BPH-related bladder symptoms.

New and Minimally Invasive Surgical Innovations in BPH11-13

For patients who fail medical therapy or have complications such as urinary retention, recurrent UTIs, or bladder stones, surgery remains the definitive treatment for BPH. However, traditional surgical techniques such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) have been associated with complications such as bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and prolonged recovery times. As a result, newer minimally invasive techniques have emerged, offering effective symptom relief with fewer complications and shorter recovery periods.

1. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

TURP has been the gold standard for surgical management of BPH for decades. During TURP, the obstructing portion of the prostate is removed through the urethra using a resectoscope, which improves urinary flow and relieves LUTS.

Benefits:
  • Proven efficacy with long-term symptom relief.
Challenges:
  • TURP is associated with a risk of bleeding, urethral strictures, and sexual side effects, such as retrograde ejaculation and, in rare cases, erectile dysfunction.
  • Hospitalization and catheterization are typically required, with recovery taking several weeks.

2. Laser-Based Therapies

Laser therapies, including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives to TURP. These procedures use high-energy lasers to vaporize or enucleate the prostate tissue, resulting in similar outcomes to TURP but with reduced bleeding and shorter recovery times.

Benefits:
  • Reduced risk of bleeding, making these procedures suitable for patients on anticoagulation therapy.
  • Shorter hospital stays and faster recovery compared to TURP.
Challenges:
  • Laser equipment is expensive and requires specialized training for urologists.
  • There is a risk of irritative urinary symptoms following the procedure, though these typically resolve over time.

3. Prostatic Urethral Lift (UroLift)

The UroLift system is a novel, minimally invasive procedure that involves the placement of small implants to retract the enlarged prostate tissue and open the urethra. Unlike TURP and laser therapies, UroLift does not involve the removal of prostate tissue, preserving sexual function.

Benefits:
  • Preserves ejaculatory and erectile function, making it an attractive option for sexually active men.
  • Performed on an outpatient basis, with most patients returning to normal activities within days.
Challenges:
  • UroLift may be less effective in patients with very large prostates or severe obstruction.

4. Water Vapor Therapy (Rezum)

Rezum is a minimally invasive procedure that uses steam to ablate prostate tissue. The heat from the steam causes targeted destruction of the hyperplastic tissue, reducing prostate size and improving symptoms over time.

Benefits:
  • Performed under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting.
  • Low risk of sexual side effects, with many patients experiencing preserved erectile and ejaculatory function.
Challenges:
  • Symptom improvement may take several weeks as the body absorbs the ablated tissue.

5. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE)

Prostate artery embolization is a novel, non-surgical treatment that involves blocking the blood supply to the prostate, causing the gland to shrink. Performed by interventional radiologists, PAE is a relatively new procedure that has shown promising results in reducing prostate volume and improving LUTS.

Benefits:
  • Minimally invasive and does not require general anesthesia.
  • Suitable for patients who are not good candidates for surgery due to comorbidities.
Challenges:
  • Long-term efficacy is still being evaluated, and some patients may require repeat procedures.

6. Aquablation Therapy

Aquablation is a robotic-assisted, water-based procedure that uses high-pressure water jets to remove prostate tissue with precision. The technique is guided by real-time imaging, which allows for accurate targeting of the obstructing tissue while preserving surrounding structures.

Benefits:
  • Aquablation offers a balance between minimally invasive techniques and the efficacy of traditional surgical approaches.
  • Reduced risk of sexual dysfunction compared to TURP and HoLEP.
Challenges:
  • Aquablation requires specialized equipment and training, and long-term outcomes are still being studied.

Trends and Future Directions in BPH Management1,2,14,15,16

1. Personalized Treatment Approaches

As the understanding of BPH pathophysiology continues to evolve, there is growing recognition of the need for personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient characteristics, including prostate size, severity of symptoms, comorbidities, and treatment goals. The emergence of new diagnostic tools, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biomarkers, has enabled more tailored approaches to both medical and surgical management.

2. Advancements in Imaging and Diagnostic Tools

Advances in prostate imaging, including multiparametric MRI and 3D ultrasound, have improved the ability to assess prostate anatomy and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific treatments. These imaging techniques provide detailed information on prostate size, shape, and zonal anatomy, allowing for more precise planning of surgical interventions.

3. Integration of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

The integration of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) into urology is reshaping the field of BPH surgery. Robotic-assisted techniques, such as Aquablation, allow for greater precision and reduced variability in outcomes, while AI-powered diagnostic tools can aid in treatment decision-making. In the future, AI-driven algorithms may help predict treatment success and personalize therapy based on individual risk factors and response to previous treatments.

Conclusion

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of aging men. While traditional medical therapies and surgical interventions have long been the cornerstone of BPH management, recent advancements in both pharmacological treatments and minimally invasive surgical techniques have expanded the options available to patients. New therapeutic modalities, such as combination therapy, PDE5 inhibitors, and emerging drugs targeting alternative pathways, offer more effective symptom relief with fewer side effects. Meanwhile, surgical innovations, including laser therapies, UroLift, water vapor therapy, and robotic-assisted procedures, provide less invasive options with faster recovery times and better preservation of sexual function. As the field of BPH management continues to evolve, personalized treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and advancements in imaging, robotics, and AI will play an increasingly important role in optimizing outcomes. By offering a range of therapeutic options tailored to individual needs, clinicians can improve the quality of life for men with BPH while minimizing the risks and complications associated with traditional treatments.

References
  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/urologic-diseases/prostate-problems/enlarged-prostate-benign-prostatic-hyperplasia#:~:text=Benign%20Prostatic%20Hyperplasia-,What%20is%20benign%20prostatic%20hyperplasia%3F,the%20prostate%20doubles%20in%20size
  2. Mayo Clinic. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) - Symptoms and causes [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia/symptoms-causes/syc-20370087
  3. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia-bph
  4. Benign prostatic hyperplasia [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia
  5. Lim KB. Epidemiology of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Urol. 2017 Jul;4(3):148-151.
  6. Patel ND, Parsons JK. Epidemiology and etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder outlet obstruction. Indian J Urol. 2014 Apr;30(2):170-6.
  7. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia [Internet]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/epidemiology-and-pathophysiology-of-benign-prostatic-hyperplasia#:~:text=BPH%20is%20a%20histologic%20diagnosis,of%20large%2C%20discrete%20prostatic%20nodules
  8. Miernik A, Gratzke C. Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Dec 4;117(49):843-854.
  9. Fogaing C, Alsulihem A, Campeau L, Corcos J. Is Early Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Preferable to Prolonged Medical Therapy: Pros and Cons. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 9;57(4):368. 
  10. Haile ES, Sotimehin AE, Gill BC. Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cleve Clin J Med. 2024;91(3):163-170.
  11. Franco JVA, Tesolin P, Jung JH. Update on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the role of minimally invasive procedures. Prostate Int. 2023 Mar;11(1):1-7. 
  12. Christidis D, McGrath S, Perera M, Manning T, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy: The rise in minimally invasive surgical therapies. Prostate Int. 2017 Jun;5(2):41-46.
  13. Miernik A, Gratzke C: Current treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117: 843–54. 
  14. Feiertag JH, Clark JY. National Trends in Surgical Management for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia From 2013 to 2019 in the United States. Urology Practice [Internet]. 2024 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Oct 16];11(2):303–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000504
  15. Del Giudice F, Oh JK, Basran S, Nicaise E, Song PH, Kim W, Kim SY, Min GE, Yoo KH, Cho HJ, et al. Recent Trends in the Diagnostic and Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in the U.S. from 2004 to 2017: Annual Changes in the Selection of Treatment Options and Medical Costs. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(17):8697. 
  16. Lee NG, Xue H, Lerner LB. Trends and attitudes in surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2012 Apr;19(2):6170-5. 

 

 

References
Recommended Articles
Review Article
The Role of Endoscopy in Diagnosing and Managing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Published: 28/06/2025
Review Article
Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics: Innovations in Fetal Monitoring and Diagnosis
Published: 28/06/2025
Review Article
Advances in the Treatment of Urolithiasis: From Laser Lithotripsy to Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
Published: 28/05/2025
Review Article
From Malnutrition to Obesity: Public Health Issue of this Double Burden in Indian Paediatric Nutrition
Published: 28/06/2025
© Copyright Kuwait Scientific Society